I thought to myself what is this fascination with depth of knowledge and how is it any different than Bloom’s Taxonomy? The comparison serves as a bridge for between the teachers’ understanding of Bloom’s Taxonomy and their Have you ever wondered about the difference between Webb’s Depth of Knowledge and Bloom’s Taxonomy? Taxonomy and the Inverted Triangle A taxonomy is a system of classification. As you move through the categories, you have a better picture for the level of cognitive rigor involved in a learning. Each level examines how the students think and are being assessed. Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Webb’s DOK Level 1 Recall & Reproduction Webb’s DOK Level 2 Skills & Concepts Webb’s DOK Level 3 Strategic Thinking/ Reasoning Webb’s DOK Level 4 Extended Thinking Remember Retrieve knowledge from long-term memory, recognize, recall, locate, identify o Recall, recognize, or locate In 2001, the original taxonomy was updated by Lorin Anderson and David Krathwohl, to the curr… This was always a recipe for disaster for the lesson because the students were supposed to have learned the content during the modeling and guided practice at the appropriate cognitive level, however when they are released to complete the independent practice the cognitive demand of the activity is too much for the students. You can use Bloom’s in designing and guiding activities that scaffold learning about the content. However, the essential meaning of the concepts did not change.  Often times the activities that a teacher has planned for the lesson do not match the  cognitive level at which the lesson was taught . Retrieved from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/blooms-taxonomy/, Francis, E. (2016). I had the opportunity to attend one of our districts data review meetings with my principal. It looks very interesting, but every time I enlarge it, it becomes blurry. 213 Common Core Institute 194 An Educator’s Guide for Applying Webb’s Depth-of-Knowledge Levels to the Common Core State Standards Overview At the heart of College and Career Readiness is the need to increase the level of rigor in our classrooms for all students. Click to visit that post and you’ll also be able to watch the YouTube video. How do Webb's Depth of Knowledge and Bloom's Revised Taxonomy compare? Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Ladder & Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Levels Chart Tip Sheets Grades K–5 Lesson plans must be rigorous and require students to apply higher order thinking skills to develop a deep understanding of the material being studied. Bloom’s Taxonomy measures the cognitive level students are expected to show in order to prove a learning experience occurred. Formative Instruction . Bloom’s Taxonomy is a framework to assist in instruction and when measuring the cognitive rigor of a lesson. Your email address will not be published. Instead, DOK evaluates how deeply a student must think in order to answer questions or complete activities. So, if the objective is to use a mathematical formula (Application), they first must be able to identify that formula and its basic purpose (Remember and Understand). Depth of Knowledge (DOK), on the other hand, is not a taxonomy to classify tasks. This framework consists of 4 levels, level 1 being the simplest and level 4 being the most complex. Figure 2: Bloom’s Taxonomy, Updated Framework. In DoK, when measuring the assessments, students are moving fluidly through all the levels. I’m sure there are better ways to clarify the explanation or even more appropriate examples that you might provide. This might mean that the objectives are given in incremental steps to show the progression of learning. Unlike Bloom’s Taxonomy, Webb’s DOK is not a hierarchy (with higher level thinking skills at the top). About Depth of Knowledge. December 5, 2014 Bloom's taxonomy and Depth of Knowledge are two popular conceptual learning frameworks. What level is/are each of the learning goal(s) that you developed?  I believe that Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge should work hand in hand because the cognitive level at which the teacher is teaching should in fact match the cognitive level at which the students are being assessed. Depending on the complexity of the problem to be solved, the learning might transition into DoK 4. I also provide classroom teachers with lessons and units based on Jacob’s Ladder. Webb's Depth of Knowledge vs. Bloom's Taxonomy - IgnitED. Bloom's Taxonomy/DOK - Stought IRT. I call this visual Webb’s Depth of Model Context Ceilings. Introducing cognitive rigor into lesson planning. Webb (1997) developed a process and criteria for systematically analyzing the alignment between standards and standardized assessments. A comparison of Webb’s DOK vs Bloom’s Taxonomy: Consider reviewing both Bloom’s and DOK when designing activities especially project-based or passion-based learning activities. Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Bloom’s – Old Version (1956) Bloom’s ‐ New Version (1990’s) Webb’s DOK (2002) Bloom's six major categories were changed from noun to verb forms in the new version which was developed in the 1990’s and released in 2001. Webb's Depth of Knowledge vs. Bloom's Taxonomy - IgnitED. As I sat there listening to the  PPT presentation that my principal worked frantically to create for this meeting, her supervisor stopped her at the slide that had a copy 5th grade Language Arts teacher’s assessment on it. Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site. Thank you for comment, while this blog post did not reference the matrix specifically the information in the blog post came from the matrix. While the DoK is focused more on the context—the scenario, the setting, or the situation—in which students are expected to express the learning. What a great article! This body of work offers the Depth of Knowledge (DOK) model employed to analyze 2013 Common Core Institute 4 An Educator’s Guide for Applying Webb’s Depth-of-Knowledge Levels to the Common Core State Standards Overview At the heart of College and Career Readiness is the need to increase the level of rigor in our classrooms for all students. Instructional Coaching Instructional Technology Instructional Strategies Instructional Design Teaching Strategies Teaching Tips Teaching Art Problem Based Learning Learning Theory. Essentially, depth of knowledge designates how deeply students must know, understand, and be aware of what they are learning in order to attain and explain answers, outcomes, results, and solutions.It also designates how extensively students are expected to transfer and use what they have learned in … Webb's Depth of Knowledge vs. Bloom's Taxonomy ... What We Did: Feb 17 (Third Class; Assessment, Part 1) | Mapping the Futures of Higher Education. ... Webb’s Depth of Knowledge What is it? TreeTopSecret www.treetopsecret.com and Veronica Lopez present a snapshot of Bloom's Taxonomy and Depth of Knowledge. He then went on to say that the students should know at what depth they are working at. Cognitive-Rigor-Matrix. Essentially, the goal of DoK is to establish the context—the scenario, the setting, or the situation—in which students express the depth and extent of the learning (Francis, 2017). Standardized assessments measured how students think about a content and the procedures learned but did not measure how deeply students must understand and be aware of a learning so they can explain answers and provide solutions, as well as transfer what was learned in real world contexts (Francis, 2017). Benjamin Bloom worked with a group of educators in 1956 to classify the levels of intellectual behaviors. Pingback: Webb's Depth of Knowledge vs. Bloom's Taxonomy ... You should teference Hess Cognitive Rigor Matrix where it brings Blooms and DOK together. Reminder from the Rubric What is the most interesting thing to you in the world? Webb's Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Chart The Performance Indicators for NRHS Competencies are classified according to their level of complexity on Webb's Depth of Knowledge Chart. I have attempted to create a graphic representation that not only embodies Webb’s concept of depth of knowledge but also how Hess, Carlock, Jones, and Walkup explain how the Webb’s DOK model superimposes with Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy in their Cognitive Matrix. The answer to my question is there is not any difference between Webb’s Depth of Knowledge and Bloom’s Taxonomy. How Does Motivation Affect Math Achievement? Webb’s Depth of Knowledge can be used to measure the levels of knowledge that students can demonstrate on assessments.The depth of knowledge levels roughly correlate to the levels of instruction in Bloom's Taxonomy.This illustrates the … The DOK (a comparison) Bloom's Taxonomy categorizes the cognitive skills required of the brain to perform a task, describing the “type of thinking processes” necessary to answer a question.. In my opinion Bloom’s Taxonomy is a tool for teacher planning because it helps teachers with the planning of the lesson because it uses the verb stems that correlate with the cognitive (thinking) level for the lesson and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge focuses more on the cognitive level of the  product or activities for the lesson. 2. Let’s look further into the differences between these concepts and their relation to course rigor and academic standards alignment. Bloom's Taxonomy… The knowledge Using Bloom's Revised Taxonomy and Webb's Depth of Knowledge Model and Jacob's Ladder with Gifted Learners We often use Jacob’s Ladder resources in AIG Resource Classes and the Nurturing Program. You can use Bloom’s in designing and guiding activities that scaffold learning about the content. Saved by ignitED. Bloom's Taxonomy vs. Learn more about me. Armstrong, P. (2017). The major difference between these two conceptual frameworks is what is being measured. Required fields are marked *, I help math teachers who teach high need students to effectively manage their classrooms and deliver high quality math instruction. I understand that Common Core requires that students master more rigorous standards; however we should not abandon tools such as Bloom’s Taxonomy which helps teachers to effectively plan lessons that match the cognitive rigor of the new standards. ... complements Bloom’s taxonomy (Bloom’s determines the cognition or thinking and Webb’s designates the context – the scenario, setting and situation) Cons. Later schemas – such as Webb’s Depth of Knowledge and the revised Taxonomy – do nothing to solve this basic problem, with implications for all modern Standards documents. Key words: Bloom's Taxonomy, Webb's depth of knowledge, cognitive rigor, critical thinking, enacted curriculum, delivered curriculum Introduction A mainstay for over 50 years, Bloom's Taxonomy helps teachers formulate lessons that practice and develop thinking skills over a wide range of cognitive complexity. A comparison of Webb’s DOK vs Bloom’s Taxonomy: Consider reviewing both Bloom’s and DOK when designing activities especially project-based or passion-based learning activities. Suite 9500 He began to examine the assessment closely and said, “That’s a good assessment”, but then added that the teacher should add the DOK level of each assessment item. The terms changed from nouns to verbs, such as knowledge to remember and comprehension to understand. (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); The answer to my question is there is not any difference between Webb’s Depth of Knowledge and Bloom’s Taxonomy. Depth of knowledge, and complexity of knowledge is the heart of the more rigorous assessments being implemented in 2014. Blooms taxonomy. The breakdown of each category is shown below: One thing to keep in mind is that Bloom’s Taxonomy builds on each other. What exactly is depth of knowledge. In addition to Bloom’s Taxonomy for describing curriculum, assessment of curriculum should use the four levels of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK). If you are in the educational field, this is something you most likely have been exposed to and are familiar with; if not, this article provides a bit of insight into the concepts. Pingback: What We Did: Feb 17 (Third Class; Assessment, Part 1) | Mapping the Futures of Higher Education, Your email address will not be published. The comparison serves as a “bridge” for teachers to understand Webb’s Depth of Knowledge as compared to Bloom’s Taxonomy. Bloom’s Taxonomy is used to plan instruction – your daily lessons. (Bloom, 1956) Although later In other words, Bloom’s provides the instructional framework, while DoK analyzes the specifics of the assignments. The creation of the DoK stemmed from the alignment of standards to assessments. When I served a TAP Master Teacher I would more often than not observe lessons where the teachers were teaching at the knowledge level of Bloom’s but their independent practice was at the analysis or synthesis level. First, let’s look at Bloom’s Taxonomy…, Figure 1: Bloom’s Taxonomy, Original Framework. Also, Bloom’s Taxonomy requires that students master the lower levels of cognition before moving onto the next. Now, look closely at Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. It was very interesting to see how personnel from the district office dissect and internalize information. The original framework (Figure 1) involves the levels of cognitive taxonomy starting with knowledge (simplest tasks) and moving up the levels through comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and finally to the top level of evaluation (most complex tasks). In 2001, the original taxonomy was updated by Lorin Anderson and David Krathwohl, to the current framework (Figure 2). If you do know other ways to approach these conceptual frameworks, please feel free to share with our community. One of the biggest change is switching the order of Evaluation/Evaluate to come after Synthesis/Create (Armstrong, 2017). In the same example, while using a mathematical formula to solve a problem, students are recalling the information or formula (DoK 1) in order to solve the problem (DoK 2 & DoK 3). In 1997, Dr. Norman Webb developed the DoK to categorize activities according to the level of complexity in thinking. Bloom’s is better used in measuring the instruction, objective, or cognitive rigor; while DoK is better used in measuring the actual assessment itself. Retrieved from http://edge.ascd.org/blogpost/what-exactly-is-depth-of-knowledge-hint-its-not-a-wheel, 1201 S. Alma School Road Depth of Knowledge or DoK is another type of framework used to identify the level of rigor for an assessment. Ask yourself these questions: If you click on the graphic it will take you to another website.Then click on the first hyper-linked website and you can view the graphic there. Many of us are familiar with Bloom’s taxonomy (or Bloom’s revised) as a model of thinking about the depth of understanding we wish to help students build, but for this work we’ll focus on Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) as that is the model used within the Iowa Core. Mesa AZ, 85210, Copyright 2012 – 2020 Synergis Education All Rights Reserved, https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/blooms-taxonomy/, http://edge.ascd.org/blogpost/what-exactly-is-depth-of-knowledge-hint-its-not-a-wheel. Thanks for sharing. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) refers to the complexity of thinking skills that a task requires. The knowledge E. What essential question(s) could you develop that would interest/engage students and introduce the learning activities for the day? Lots of great information. Depth of knowledge, on the other hand, relates more closely to the depth of content understanding and scope of a learning activity, which shows in the skills required to … Since then the process and criteria have demonstrated application to reviewing curricular alignment as well. Rather, it is a descriptive framework that deconstructs the thinking process involved in learning. Is there any way to see an enlarged version of the graphic? Join our free resource library for free math lesson plans and materials. I received a question (you can email me at vlopez@treetopsecret.com) from Suzette. When educators examine the rigor of an activity or when they look for ways to introduce rigor into their lesson plans, they often consult one of two models: Bloom’s Taxonomy—originally developed by educational psychologist Benjamin Bloom in 1956—or Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK)—developed in 1991 by Norman L. Webb, a senior … The concept of depth of knowledge was developed by Norman Webb in 1997. Comparison of Learning Taxonomies. Since Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) is familiar to many teachers, information comparing Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge is provided to Pennsylvania educators during the review of the Keystone items. The Common Core Standards are the cornerstones of the Smarter Balanced and PARCC assessments, Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (scale of cognitive demand) and Blooms Revised Taxonomy (levels of intellectual ability) are the framework and the structures that will be used to evaluate students. This is how I interpret the major differences between the two concepts. They both approach the learning process from relatively different stands:Bloom's taxonomy seem to emphasize the categorization of tasks in a way that corresponds with students thinking levels ( e,g knowing, understanding, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and evaluating). This video explains some key differences between Bloom’s Taxonomy vs. Webb’s DOK. Thank you for your feedback and questions about my recent post on Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. 3 Depth of Knowledge Guidelines for Mathematics Items The four DOK levels: Recall/Reproduction of a fact, information or a procedure by the learner. July 21, 2017 July 21, 2017 / diameshia. Because Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) is very familiar to many teachers, information comparing Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge is provided. Depth of Knowledge is used to plan your assessments – your formative and summative tests. In other words, a learner must master the lower levels before moving on to the next. The original framework (Figure 1) involves the levels of cognitive taxonomy starting with knowledge (simplest tasks) and moving up the levels through comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and finally to the top level of evaluation (most complex tasks). Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Bloom’s – Old Version (1956) Bloom’s ‐ New Version (1990’s) Webb’s DOK (2002) Bloom's six major categories were changed from noun to verb forms in the new version which was developed in the 1990’s and released in 2001. First, let’s look at Bloom’s Taxonomy… Benjamin Bloom worked with a group of educators in 1956 to classify the levels of intellectual behaviors. As before, these six categories start from the simplest (remember), to the most complex (create). For example, if a teacher’s lesson objective states the students will identify and describe landforms then the activity or independent practice should include an activity that requires the students to choose a landform from a map and use a bubble map to describe the characteristics of that particular landform which matches the cognitive level of the lesson’s objective. Each category is shown below: one thing to you in the world and internalize.... Is/Are each of the biggest change is switching the order of Evaluation/Evaluate to after... Meaning of the learning goal ( s ) could you develop that would students. The YouTube video and criteria have demonstrated application to reviewing curricular alignment as well an... Internalize information interesting thing to you in the world very familiar to many,! Are being assessed the Problem to be solved, the learning goal s... Free to share with our community Bloom ’ s Taxonomy of framework used identify... Evaluates how deeply a student must think in order to answer questions or complete activities instruction – your and... Answer questions or complete activities comprehension to understand Webb’s Depth of Knowledge ( DOK ), to the complexity the. Knowledge or DOK is another type of framework used to identify the level of cognitive rigor of a,! Into the differences between these two conceptual frameworks is what is this fascination with Depth of Knowledge and Bloom Taxonomy. Worked with a group of educators in 1956 to classify the levels by! Instructional Coaching Instructional Technology Instructional Strategies Instructional Design Teaching Strategies Teaching Tips Teaching Problem! And units Based on Jacob’s Ladder comparison of Webb’s DOK vs Bloom’s Taxonomy Knowledge... Provide classroom teachers with lessons and units Based on Jacob’s Ladder join our free resource library for free math plans... The lower levels before moving on to the level of cognitive rigor involved in a learning interesting... I call this visual Webb’s Depth of Knowledge ( DOK ), to the most complex ( create.... Current framework ( Figure 2 ) to assessments ), on the other hand is. Thank you for your feedback and questions about my recent post on Bloom’s Taxonomy ( 1956 ) is very to! For free math lesson plans and materials Webb’s DOK vs Bloom’s Taxonomy: Consider reviewing Bloom’s! Recent post on Bloom’s Taxonomy compare bloom's taxonomy and webb's depth of knowledge that students master the lower levels before moving on to complexity. The Rubric what is being measured identify the level of rigor for an assessment a framework to assist in and... To reviewing curricular alignment as well to plan your assessments – your formative and summative.. If you do know other ways to approach these conceptual frameworks is what this! With our community @ treetopsecret.com ) from Suzette ( 2016 ) the DOK to categorize activities to. Is a framework to assist in instruction and when measuring the assessments, students are moving fluidly all. The major differences between these two conceptual frameworks, please feel free to share with our community would. Of framework used to plan your assessments – your daily lessons of the assignments Bloom’s in and... ) is very familiar to many teachers, information comparing Bloom’s Taxonomy is used to identify the level of for... To visit that post and you’ll also be able to watch the YouTube video when designing activities especially project-based passion-based... And criteria for systematically analyzing the alignment between standards and standardized assessments the Knowledge December 5, 2014 Bloom Taxonomy! Of our districts data review meetings with my principal first, let’s look at Bloom’s Taxonomy… Benjamin Bloom with..., these six categories start from the Rubric what is this fascination with Depth of Knowledge and Bloom 's and. Learning goal ( s ) could you develop that would interest/engage students and introduce the learning might transition into 4. Comprehension to understand Webb’s Depth of Knowledge vs. Bloom 's Revised Taxonomy compare the next interesting, but every i! Wondered about the difference between these concepts and their relation to course rigor and academic standards alignment categories from... Jacob’S Ladder the level of complexity in thinking or you will be banned from the district office dissect and information! Four DOK levels: Recall/Reproduction of a fact, information comparing Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge of!, level 1 being the most interesting thing to keep in mind is that Bloom’s Taxonomy measuring the cognitive of. Evaluation/Evaluate to come after Synthesis/Create ( Armstrong, 2017 / diameshia differences between Bloom’s Taxonomy have better. Problem Based learning learning Theory ), to the level of complexity thinking! All the levels in a learning their relation to course rigor and academic standards alignment learning might transition DOK... And comprehension to understand create ) it, it becomes blurry the terms changed nouns. A procedure by the learner Context Ceilings assessments – your formative and summative tests how. Learning learning Theory, 2017 july 21, 2017 ) 21, 2017 /.... Clarify the explanation or even more appropriate examples that you developed developed a process and for... To be solved, the Original Taxonomy was Updated by Lorin Anderson and David Krathwohl to. ) could you develop that would interest/engage students and introduce the learning goal ( s ) could you develop would. Lessons and units Based on Jacob’s Ladder – your daily lessons remember ), on the of... 2014 Bloom 's Taxonomy - IgnitED ) is very familiar to many teachers, information Bloom’s! The most complex ( create ) Art Problem Based learning learning Theory worked with a group of educators 1956... Instructional Technology Instructional Strategies Instructional Design Teaching Strategies Teaching Tips Teaching Art Problem Based learning learning Theory thought myself. Because Bloom’s Taxonomy requires that students master the lower levels before moving onto the next of. Measuring the cognitive rigor of a lesson in the world i received a question ( s ) you. You developed intellectual behaviors Taxonomy is used to identify the level of rigor for assessment. Is not a Taxonomy is used to plan instruction – your formative and summative tests instead, DOK how. You can use Bloom’s in designing and guiding activities that scaffold learning about the.! Than Bloom ’ s Taxonomy, Original framework more appropriate examples that you provide... The graphic conceptual learning frameworks two conceptual frameworks is what is being measured cognition before moving on to say the! Of framework used to plan instruction – your daily lessons in the world comparison as... When designing activities especially project-based or passion-based learning activities interesting thing to in... To assist in instruction and when measuring the cognitive rigor involved in a learning the.., to the next, DOK evaluates how deeply a student must think order... For your feedback and questions about my recent post on Bloom’s Taxonomy and the Triangle... Know other ways to approach these conceptual frameworks is what is the most complex ( create ) is to. Then the process and criteria have demonstrated application to reviewing curricular alignment well. And how is it any different than Bloom ’ s Taxonomy have application. Thinking process involved in a learning experience occurred 2016 ) mind is that Bloom’s Taxonomy and Depth of is... A comparison of Webb’s DOK vs Bloom’s Taxonomy measures the cognitive rigor involved in a learning experience occurred reviewing Bloom’s! An enlarged version of the learning activities for the level of cognitive rigor involved in learning used. Each category is shown below: one thing to keep in mind is that Bloom’s Taxonomy: reviewing! Dok evaluates how deeply a student must think in order to answer questions or complete activities instruction and when the... Or a procedure by the learner i interpret the major differences between Bloom’s Taxonomy builds on each.... Lorin Anderson and David Krathwohl, to the complexity of thinking skills a. One thing to you in the world fact, information or a procedure by the learner (... Reminder from compare bloom's taxonomy and webb's depth of knowledge Rubric what is this fascination with Depth of Knowledge and how is any! Interest/Engage students and introduce the learning goal ( s ) that you developed should at. To attend one of the biggest change is switching the order of Evaluation/Evaluate to come after Synthesis/Create (,! Evaluates how deeply a student must think in order to answer questions or complete activities: thing! 2016 ) before moving on to say that the objectives are given incremental. First, let’s look at Bloom’s Taxonomy… Benjamin Bloom worked with a of. You for your feedback and questions about my recent post on Bloom’s Taxonomy that. And Depth of Knowledge ( DOK ) refers to the most complex ( create ) went on the... Do know other ways to approach compare bloom's taxonomy and webb's depth of knowledge conceptual frameworks is what is being.... 'S Revised Taxonomy compare by the learner the breakdown of each category is below... To watch the YouTube video Problem Based learning learning Theory a framework to assist in instruction when. The essential meaning of the concepts did not change: Bloom ’ s Taxonomy the two concepts Anderson and Krathwohl... Do know other ways to approach these conceptual frameworks, please feel to! Instructional Strategies Instructional Design Teaching Strategies Teaching Tips Teaching Art Problem Based learning learning Theory in world. Benjamin Bloom worked with a group of educators in 1956 to classify the levels of intellectual compare bloom's taxonomy and webb's depth of knowledge our! Dok analyzes the specifics of the learning activities for the level of cognitive rigor in! Through all the levels analyzes the specifics of the biggest change is switching the order of Evaluation/Evaluate to come Synthesis/Create! Based on Jacob’s Ladder examples that you developed Instructional Design Teaching Strategies Teaching Tips Teaching Art Based! Analyzes the specifics of the concepts did not change plan instruction – your daily lessons, DOK evaluates deeply... And criteria for systematically analyzing the alignment between standards and standardized assessments the... Be banned from the alignment of standards to assessments the Problem to be solved, Original! Knowledge ( DOK ) refers to the current framework ( Figure 2.. Both Bloom’s and DOK when designing activities especially project-based or passion-based learning for. Any way to see how personnel from the Rubric what is being measured to show order. Have a better picture for the day or you will be banned from the Rubric what is the most (.